Ossama Bin Moore!!
Ossama (Osama) Bin Moore
This is the first time ever I write an English post in this Arabic blog*. I thought, however, that it is important to summarize -in English- my latest post about Bin Laden's latest tape.
I am so surprised that some respectable media figures are trying to analyze whether this tape will enhance or threaten Bush's lead in the polls. To me, it's obviously a pro-Bush event.
While some conspiracy-theory sites think the tape may be fake- and they may be right, I can't confirm that and I can't agree or disagree. What amazes me is the timing.
I wonder who does Bin Laden work for? Why would he offer his 'opponent' G.W.Bush such a good political opportunity?
It is amazing also that the guy who speaks in that tape, and who is supposed to be Ossama, seems to be using Michael Moore's movie "Fahrenheit 911" as a reference**. Has he watched the movie? Does he support it? What a psychological effect can this cause to the simple average American voter's mind?
Would some people think that Ossama is pro-Kerry? that he wants to get rid of Bush? Whom will this help? To whom goes the benefit?
Since I am not a voter and I have no rights to vote, why should I care??
What I care about is the media. I want to understand why Aljazeera -for example-, who claims to be against the Iraq war and wants to end it as soon as possible, publishes this tape at this critical time of history?
I wonder who is behind this tape? I wonder how do Aljazeera reporters think; do they really only look for making more money through these movies.. or... something else?
Does anybody have reasonable grown-up suggestions?
Footnotes:
* This blog is normally written in Arabic.
Visit my other blogs in English:
News and Views
One-liners (for those in a hurry)
Strictly headlines
** Although the tape doesn't really cite Michael Moore's movie, here is an excerpt from the English translation by Aljazeera that almost quotes Moore:
"It never occurred to us that the Commander in Chief of the armed forces would abandon 50,000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone at a time when they most needed him.
But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers we were given three times the period required to execute the operations. All praise is due to Allah."
IF YOU LIKE THIS BLOG, PLEASE VOTE FOR IT AS THE BEST JOURNALISTIC BLOG IN ARABIC.
Other links:
- Juan Cole's informed comment
- Daniel Brett Weblog
7تعليقات:
Since you are from arabic language, what is your idea about the "Supposed ben Laden" video about really?? I mean, what is "he " saying for real??
Peace & merci for your time !!
"OO"
Dear "OO", I have no idea of couse how to prove the authenticiy of the tape. I don't claim if it does or doesn't belong to Bin Laden. It just presents a completely new "discourse" used by Alqaeda. I posted the link to the transcript from Aljazeera English website, but -again- I can't confirm that the tape has not been edited...
did he see the movie or did they have something arranged?
Is there any one inside Aljazeera on US payroll? The timing looks too good to be otherwise.
9-11 Commission had several illuminati moles, making it a paper tiger.
Many fake Osama tapes have been produced to keep the wars going for the profits of the International Bankers and for the Corporations that feed on those who believe their propaganda.
http://www.govsux.com/NWO8.htm
Whether to paint or wallpaper your kitchen is a matter of opinion, however, two plus two equals four is a fact.
The following is a proven FACT.
Here is not conjecture but proof.
The "warnings" prior to 9-11 were merely a public psychological preparation; this is the illuminati mode of operation. After an attack, the public thinks it already knows whom to blame. This is not speculation; it is a well-substantiated fact. Many have done the research but very few have connected the dots. Try deductive reasoning.
http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm
The mainstream media will not report the truth about 9-11 probably for decades or even a century to come. FDR’s participation in Pearl Harbor is an example.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/pearl.html
The 9-11 fraud has been proven beyond any doubt, using logic and hard science. The players don’t even need to be mentioned to decipher the truth. Unfortunately math and physics are just too hard for the average pedestrian to understand. In any event, if one wishes to cast blame simply see who will stand to profit from any given event and statistically you will likely find the guilty parties. This part is simple yet our culture continues to trust those in “authority” rather than simple analytical reasoning. As an example consider this, what could cause a massive electro-magnetic impulse capable of temporarily stopping cell phone reception over at least a one-mile diameter? The answer is a nuclear explosion, just like the two explosions that brought down the WTC. For several minutes the people in the area reported no cell phone or other small electrical appliances functioning.
You might be interested to know that the WTC buildings probably did come down as a result of some kind of small nuclear bomb like device planted in the basement seven stories beneath street level in each of the towers. The fake Boeings were clearly navigated by remote control,
http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=64938;title=APFN
while the crew and passengers were removed from the real Boeings to rule out possible surviving witnesses.
http://www.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=04/03/14/212247
Those planes pulled "G" forces in those turns that were impossible. The planes have built-in safeguards that make such maneuvers impossible (for the protection of the passenger and crew), EVEN WHEN AUTOPILOT IS DISABLED. The only way those planes could have done those maneuvers is if their internal safety restraints were overruled from outside remote control. This bit of information COMES FROM COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE PILOTS, and was widely available days after 9-11 when commercial pilots said what they saw was impossible.
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_government&Number=1016889&t=-1
The Columbia University seismic research center, across the Hudson River in NJ recorded the spike on the graph that is indicative of only one thing, a nuclear blast, one for each of the towers. One month after the terror, the NYC fire department recorded temperatures at the core of the rubble at about 2000 F degrees. In oxygen starved environment, again this is indicative of nuclear blasts. Civilians in NYC with Geiger counters found very high readings around the ruins compared to the rest of NYC.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm
So far NO MEDIA in the U.S. has had the
courage to face the truth. In fact, most have participated in the cover-up.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamatape.html
http://www.geocities.com/killtown/
http://www.911pi.com/
http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html
http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
Initial air tests were done by civilians who forced a ridiculously naive statement by the EPA that the terrorists had carried depleted uranium onto the planes, (see WTC Air Studies half way down this site) http://traprockpeace.org/LettertoMcDermott.doc The reluctant “studies” later done by the EPA were greatly watered down by Washington DC. and stated that there was no harm to the public. Yet, as reported in the daily papers here without giving any explanation, babies born in NYC around “GROUND ZERO” two years after the attacks are showing low birth weight compared to the babies born else where in NYC. Police and Fire Fighters here have been experiencing numerous illnesses post 9-11 similar to the so-called Gulf War Syndrome.
The Pentagon crash is simply too obvious for analysis.
A Boeing 757 has a wingspan of 124 feet 10 inches.
The damage to the Pentagon was 75 feet across.
Flight 77 DID NOT crash into the Pentagon.
It was either a Global Hawk or a USAF fighter.
The pictures are everywhere.
Again, the only thing on this planet that could disintegrate one-foot thick solid steel beams at the core of the WTC Towers, in less than one second, completely evaporating the solid foundations, and creating a double feature of the most spectacular controlled demolition in history, was some new type of small nuclear bomb, orchestrated by The Bushes (Senior and Junior), Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, & Friends, Norad, CIA, FEMA, Boeing, Mossad, David Rockefeller, Larry Silverstein and many other rich Illuminati members (perhaps known to pedestrians as neo-cons, their leaders are in the CFR) they are forever profiting from the misery of those around them.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2004/080904wargamescover.htm
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm
that literally worship the "enlightened one" Satan! Sounds sick but the history proves it (these are cold logical facts void of opinions). They fully expect to survive a world wide nuclear war with their underground bunkers, that is their ultimate goal, their preparations makes this clear.
"We are on the verge of a global transformation,
All we need is the right major crisis and the
nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller
http://www.govsux.com/NWO_table_of_contents.htm
Just a side note, CELL PHONE CALLS FROM A FLYING AIRLINER IS IMPOSSIBLE PERIOD.
(Look at the date of this usatoday report!)
http://www.usatoday.com/money/biztravel/2004-07-19-aircells_x.htm
The psychology is simple; create a homegrown terror, blame it on someone else, thereby stirring up “patriotism”, then attack that someone else with public resources (including taxes and lives) and collect the loot for yourself.
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_miscellaneous&Number=292696345&t=-1#Post292696345
It’s an old formula used at least as far back as Caesar, and it still works today. Project Northwoods, and the history of the Free Mason and the Illuminati are in this and other countries all over the world makes their objectives obvious. Incidentally, the US vote will probably be stolen (again) this time with the new DIEBOLD voting machines. Good luck in the New World Order, if you survive WWIII.
"If tyranny and oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy"
~ James Madison
Consider these sites as well.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/wtc/index02.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flight77.htm
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/northwoods.html
http://www.cam.net.uk/home/Nimmann/peace/truth.htm
Dear poster,
I'm utterly shocked that you link Osama to Moore in any context. The idea that really got me in your article is the average american voter. I'm totally disappointed in the average american voter who believes only in his small tv screen and have not interest to search or educate him/herself about the rest of the world.
Al Jazeera network in my opinion is one of the most successful in the world despite all the american attempts to label it to be the evil news media. Oh! forgot to tell you that George Bush cousin is the CEO of fox news that labels anyone who disagrees with George Bush as a terrorist.
Now that we know who works for Bush let me give you a friendly reminder that Osama himself worked for the United States of America for long years to fight the Russians.
I can see that you don't care about voting and very concerned about the media you are darn right the media in America is a disgrace and you should check out the BBC to know that the American media is the most biased.
A reasonable tip for you as per your request is to focus on the real issues which is why they never captured Ossama and got Saddam duh!
This is food for thought
Thanks to all comments, unfortunately they are all from "anonymous" who left no email addresses. I wish you come back to read my reply.
* To: Anonymous #4
Yes. I'm a frequent reader of rense and whatreallyhappened and other conspiracy sites. This doesn't mean I have to believe all what I read there, but I respect it and put it in consideration. I was just commenting on this single event and I prefer to let readers think and ask questions instead of forcing them to adopt a view.
* To: Anonyomous #5
All my respect to Michael Moore. He's a good example of a writer, artist who is also activist, trying to apply what he says. Many people read the title and misread the lines: I meant that Ossama is adopting some Moore's views and I was questioning whether this is a media spin to put Moore in Osama's side, and thus put any Bush opponents int he same basket. The outcome would be a political gain to the Bush side rather than a support to Moore. I know about Fox and other networks, I don't fully trust any, including Aljazeera: the latter are the only media people who describe some victims as "martyrs" and others as "dead people"...
Post a Comment
<< Home